General/Base Info:
Kitty Lane [aka Kittie Lane]
This is a hidden text,
acting just like a spacer
type of text in order to
push the Entity info
down on the page. Sorry to have wasted your time/ear to listen to this, I was just trying to get a layout work like I wanted.
Info Last updated: 08.01.2017 (12:47:37)
Kittie Lane Lode - Sur. No. 8423 Amended
My Collection; Claim map with Rails laid on top, based on the 1902 claims overview map I have.
Media ID: 204
Id No. (Mine / 1902 map):
Date Located / Formed:
Raven Hill - S.W. Slope
Location Map Description:
Discovery / Formed by:
    Fate details:
    Owned by:
    • Gould Mining and Milling Company
      -> 1893-10-06 [claim Map]
      -> 1898-03-02 [claim Map]
      -> 1900-xx-xx [reported As Owner]
    Known claims:
    • Kittie Lane lode - 8423
    Claim Links:
    Location Claim Description:
    Patented Date:
    Mineral Certificate No.:
    General Land Office No.:
    Known Transportation Connection:
      Extra Info/Details [Linked at One Time to the Entity]:
      Vertical Shaft
      Known Producing Info:
      General notes:
      Map is boring. The Discovery Shaft is about 1/7 northwest of the southeast border, with a second Shaft about 2/7 northwest of southeast border. On the Amended map lot of ground has been lost to other claims, taking it down from 10,143 Acres to 5,121 Acres.. It has also been turned into a broken up claim with four separate pieces, two very tiny, not really useful and one in northwest that could have been useful but there is nothing there.
      graphic for visual presentation of text All the action is down on the southern part, where the second shaft mention above is also lost ground, there seem to be a Tract B. belonging to the Anna May claim. But, some work have been done, as there is now a Cut going to the discovery shaft from the southeast a short distance. Sadly maps are to early for the railroad to show up, but I managed to fix that my self using the Amended map and my 1902 claims overview map to add in the railroads where it interacts with this claim.
      graphic for visual presentation of text As this claim's name is associated as a working mine as per my 1902/03 topographic map, placing it up where the tail end of the M.T. switchback is, I assume it is because by the time that map was made the same company owning this claim also owns the Sitting Bull No. 2 claim, and sometime after the claim maps was made but before the topographic map, there most have been made a shaft in that area. As per February 2015 no info has yet been found to prove that, except it is drawn there in the topographic map. :-)