General/Base Info:
Garfield-Grouse Mine
This is a hidden text,
acting just like a spacer
type of text in order to
push the Entity info
down on the page. Sorry to have wasted your time/ear to listen to this, I was just trying to get a layout work like I wanted.
Info Last updated: 24.05.2024 (17:36:34)
Id No. (Mine / 1902 map):
433
Type:
Mine
Date Located / Formed:
20.02.1892
Location:
Bull Hill
Location Map Description:
Discovery / Formed by:
    Status:
    Unknown
    Fate details:
    Owned by:
    • E.H. Webb
      -> 1894-10-08 [claim Map]
    • Garfield Consolidated Mining Company
      -> 1900 [reported As Owner]
      -> 1901-01 [reported As Owner]
    • Stratton Cripple Creek Mining and Development Company
      -> 1903-01-01 [reported As Owner]
    Known claims:
    • Garfield Lode - 9065
    Claim Links:
    Location Claim Description:
    Patented Date:
    Mineral Certificate No.:
    0
    General Land Office No.:
    0
    Known Transportation Connection:
      Extra Info/Details [Linked at One Time to the Entity]:

      Known Producing Info:
      April 1894 regular shipping
      General notes:
      From all I been able to find out - which is very little - this seems to relate to the company that in the 1900 Manual book is called the Garfield Consolidated Mining Company, and which it around then was rumored was to be consolidated with the Bankers Gold Mining and Milling Company who also owns land around same mine.
      graphic for visual presentation of text The confusion factor here is the name Garfield-Grouse mine, as the Bankers Co. own the Grouse claim which goes sort of 90 degree on the Garfield, making them share a large portion of land but being separate mines...
      graphic for visual presentation of text In January (23) of 1898 I could read in Morning Times that the Garfield Grouse company has consolidated with the Mineral Rock company, which then explain what I read in Morning Times of September 20, 1899 where it mention that there is work on the Mineral Rock shaft of the Garfield-Grouse. That same paper on that date, also mention a lease on the south side of Zenobia which is to drive for the ore body left on the line by the Garfield-Grouse and as Zenobia is just north of the Grouse claim, and inside/at the Garfield claim, with the Mineral Rock crossing both Garfield, Grouse and Zenobia I think it is the same company with the Garfield in the front of its name.
      graphic for visual presentation of text Still a bit confusion and hard to keep track of this.