Sort on Published Date;
Oldest First |
Newest First OR,
Sort on Info First Seen/Last Updated at Top
Info Database Last Updated 08.04.2024 (Entity News entries: 2)
Type/Category of Info:
Article
Info Source From:
Fairplay Flume. Volume: 24 [XXIV], Issue No. 13Info Publication Date:
May 2, 1902Info found on page:
1Info Title:
T. F. T. is Part of Consolidation
One of the largest consolidations of property within, the Cripple Creek district is announced from the Colorado Springs office of the Woods Investment Company. The T. F. T. claim is included in the deal.
Notes/Text been Edited:
Abstracted and partly rewritten from source text.Internet Source Text Link(s) {Found/Seen/Known]:
Above Info was Last Updated on 10.10.2021 (18:51:24)
Above Info was First Seen 12.01.2021
Type/Category of Info:
General Mining News
Info Source From:
The San Juan Prospector. Volume: 31 [XXXI], Issue No. 1582Info Publication Date:
May 28, 1904Info found on page:
4Info Title:
Londonderry vs United Gold Mines Co. Case Decided
Londonderry Case Decided.
Judge Seeds in the District Court at Cripple Creek, May 23rd, handed down his decision in the Londonderry versus the United Gold Mines Company case, involving apex rights. It is a signal victory for the United Gold Mines Company. The case was appealed by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court.
The suit not only involved apex rights but the ownership of some seventy odd thousand dollars, now in the keeping of the court. That, however, will not be paid until a final determination by a higher court.
The court held that in conflicts between mining claims located and afterwards each party secured by patent ground originally, in conflict, the party who had prior location is entitled to all extralateral vein rights. The decision is very important in more respects than one. The court overruled the objection to the evidence that was offered on the part of the defendant.
The T. F. T. claim is an older location and is entitled to all the veins beneath and apexing in its ground.
The Londonderry is entitled to all the veins beneath and apexing its ground.
The court finds that the T. F. T. is entitled to all the veins in controversy except that part of the vein which crosses the southwesterly end line nine feet from corner No. 3 and passes out of the side line northwesterly fifteen feet from corner No. 3
There being no ore in that part of the vein remaining to the Londonderry, the judgment of the court was in favor of the T. F. T. as against the Londonderry claim, and the judgment for the defendant for costs.
Internet Source Text Link(s) {Found/Seen/Known]:
Above Info was Last Updated on 10.10.2021 (18:51:24)
Above Info was First Seen 13.01.2021