General info More detailed info List of known images Model page Share/Add info
General/Base Info:
Hillside Lode
This is a hidden text,
acting just like a spacer
type of text in order to
push the Entity info
down on the page. Sorry to have wasted your time/ear to listen to this, I was just trying to get a layout work like I wanted.
Info Last updated: 16.03.2024 (16:42:23)
Id No. (Mine / 1902 map):
3291
Type:
Lode, not Surveyed/Official
Date Located / Formed:
Location:
Mineral Hill
Location Map Description:
Discovery / Formed by:
    Status:
    Unknown
    Fate details:
    Owned by:
    • Goldstone Mining Company
      -> 1895-11-30 [reported As Owner]
    Known claims:
      Claim Links:
      Location Claim Description:
      Patented Date:
      Mineral Certificate No.:
      0
      General Land Office No.:
      0
      Known Transportation Connection:
        Extra Info/Details [Linked at One Time to the Entity]:

        Known Producing Info:
        General notes:
        Seen this referenced in a weekly magazine that was named 'United States Investor' of Nov. 30, 1895; but has not found it on known claims from the BLM List I have, so it appears there are no Survey-number to it.
        graphic for visual presentation of text Most likely it never made it to be an official claim, or name changed, no idea; I just decided to add it in my database as I have info referenced to it.
        graphic for visual presentation of textThe Morning Journal; December 5, 1894; Page 2; edited -> The Goldstone property is in conflict with the New Discovery on Mineral hill, and the ore resembles that taken from the Truax lease.
        graphic for visual presentation of textUnited States Investor; November 30, 1895; Page 1135 (19); edited -> The Goldstone Mining Co. owns the following claims: Dolphin on Carbonate Hill, patents applied for; Ben Franklin, Carbonate Hill; Hillside, Mineral Hill; Baby, Bull Hill; Guess, West slope Ironclad Hill, patented; Hard times, West slope Ironclad Hill.
        graphic for visual presentation of text-> There is a Hillside lode claim nearby that are on the BLM list, with a survey number to it, but the Dec. 1894 info say there is a conflict with another claim and this lode claim is not doing that, hence, it can't be the one referenced.