General/Base Info:
Clyde
This is a hidden text,
acting just like a spacer
type of text in order to
push the Entity info
down on the page. Sorry to have wasted your time/ear to listen to this, I was just trying to get a layout work like I wanted.
Info Last updated: 28.09.2023 (09:38:33)
This is a nice shot of one of the many smaller mine operations, easy to see as there are lot of junk around but not huge dumps – compared to the dumps around the Last Dollar Mine seen in background left against the sky, where the dumps hide the hoist house quite much and the large shaft structure also is partly hidden in the dump area.
   One other fun thing with this view of the Clyde Mine I saw much better in my higher resolution scan, there is actually a man standing at top of the Head frame, seen on the right-hand side, his legs covered by one the braces making up the frame where the wheel are.
   Dating this view is hard, but I would think this view to be from around the 1920's to 30's.Cropped; Clyde Mine C.C. Dist.
Photo by: William H. Lehr [aka Bill Lehr]
My Collection; cropped, straighten & enhanced from my 300dpi scanned postcard.
Media ID: 304
Id No. (Mine / 1902 map):
243
Type:
Mine
Date Located / Formed:
29.09.1891
Location:
Battle Mountain
Location Map Description:
Discovery / Formed by:
    Status:
    Destroyed in Open Pit
    Fate details:
    Owned by:
    • J.N. Bartels
      -> 1894-09-19 [claim Map]
      -> 1896-09-12 [Amended claim Map]
    • George H. Meeker
      -> 1894-09-19 [claim Map]
      -> 1896-09-12 [Amended claim Map]
    • Clyde Gold Mining Company
      -> 1900 [reported As Owner]
      -> 1902 [reported As Owner; Hill's Manualette March]
    Known claims:
    • Clyde lode - 8985
    Claim Links:
    Location Claim Description:
    Patented Date:
    Mineral Certificate No.:
    0
    General Land Office No.:
    0
    Known Transportation Connection:
      Extra Info/Details [Linked at One Time to the Entity]:

      Known Producing Info:
      General notes:
      Plat Map has some ground marked as belonging to this claim, that also shows up on the Harold lode claim, as marked and belonging to that lode. As of 28.09.2023 I have no info beside a Plat Map record of said Harold so if it was part of Clyde or not, I do not know, only know the Shat on the USGS 1903ish topo-map lay on ground marked on both Plat Maps.